Sunday, April 22, 2012

Movie Review: The Cabin in the Woods (2012)


The only word to describe my feelings right now is giddy. Thinking about what I saw in the movie theater yesterday, I still have a gigantic smile on my face and I just have to say that I am so goshdarn happy to be a horror fan right now. My love and loyalty to Buffy the Vampire Slayer creator Joss Whedon (and in the same way, director Drew Goddard, who was also a great writer for Buffy) had given me complete faith that he would make a movie I would love, so The Cabin in the Woods was one of those movies where I completely avoided reading even a single word about it (I never watched the teaser trailer either) before heading to the theater today. And wouldn't you know it, that's exactly the way this movie needs to be seen!

I can't talk about how much I love this movie without spoiling pretty much everything so if you haven't seen it yet, you need to get off your ass and go do that right now. I think this review is going to be more about what the movie does and how it is different rather than something analyzing the acting and effects like I usually do anyway. That might have to come later.

So basically all I knew about The Cabin in the Woods was that it was a horror movie, there were people in a cabin in the woods, and Joss Whedon was involved. But right from the beginning of the movie, I realized that I was dealing with a bit more than that. The opening credit sequence starts out familiar enough, all dark and with blood spattering over the screen, then it immediately shifts to a scene of a mundane office conversation between two middle-aged dudes. Huhhhhhh? How is this related to the movie we think we're going to see? But as the tagline suggests, this is not the typical horror movie story you think you know.

Indeed, "Huh?" is what you will be asking yourself throughout most of the film, as the scenes in the strange office building are interspersed with the scenes of our five cliche college students heading to the cabin for a weekend of fun - the nice girl, the nice guy, the jock, the sexy girl, and the pothead. As the cliches kept coming at me (especially in the scene where the group stops for gas at an old, abandoned station and meets the crazy townie who warns them of the cabin) I was getting annoyed and disappointed at my pal Joss Whedon. Joss, what the hell are you doing with all these stereotypes? I know for a fact that you are way better than this! Oh, little did I know that that was his exact intention. While it takes a while for the truth to be revealed, the payoff was beyond anything that I ever expected. I admit, I was mightily frustrated there for a bit, not knowing what was going on, but when I sat back and just let it happen, believe me I was more than satisfied.

The entire concept for this movie was simply GENIUS. Other movies have of course already poked fun at (but still been respectful of) those same old scenarios and characters and rules that prevail in a wide range of both classic and modern horror films. The Cabin in the Woods takes that about 10 steps further. Here, we have an entire company with a full staff watching the five potential victims in the cabin, and doing everything they can to make sure that these kids actually follow the standard horror movie cliches. Reading the Latin from the diary, going off into the woods to have sex, going for a walk by yourself, splitting the group up when they should be sticking together - it's all here. The kids are secretly given drugs to make them act like the stereotype they're supposed to be and the company has complete control over everything in the environment inside and outside of the cabin to make the situation go the way they want it to.

To really get the situation moving, the company gets the kids to go down into the cellar, where there lies a myriad of strange objects, most of them seemingly innocuous. The kids don't know that each object holds the power to raise a certain kind of foe that will eventually kill them - a ghost, a Pinhead-like torturer, a werewolf. All these monsters are owned by the company, deep underground underneath the cabin itself, lying in wait for their turn to be chosen. Dana reads from a diary first and thus the choice is made. The kids are now fighting against a "zombie redneck torture family" and the company's mission is almost complete. Finding out just what their final goal is is half the fun of watching the movie, and I hope that everybody loved it just as much as I did.

I cannot wait to get this movie on DVD so that I can catch up on all the little jokes that I probably missed. In the huge wide shot where they show all the cubes with the different monsters in them, I was frantically trying to catch a glimpse at what all was in there. A giant tarantula, two little twin girls, and other unrecognizable creatures are the only ones I can remember. Likewise in the scene where the winner of the betting pool was announced, I was listening to the dialogue whilst trying to quickly read all the possible monster scenarios on the dry erase board behind Richard Jenkins.

On that note, I have to say that the characters and the actors playing them in the unnamed company were far more enjoyable than the kids in the cabin. Richard Jenkins and Bradley Whitford were a hilarious duo that I couldn't get enough of. Jenkins's comedic genius is untouchable; I have loved all of his performances in a variety of roles. Buffy and Angel fans will really get a kick out of seeing Amy Acker and Tom Lenk in supporting roles, the latter one being just as charming and funny as his Buffy character, Andrew.

The bad thing about The Cabin in the Woods is that it mostly caters to a specific audience, I believe. Mainstream audiences probably do know about all these horror movie staples that are introduced and played with in this movie (perhaps because Scream flat-out told them about some of them) but overall the ones who will appreciate it the most are horror fans. The audience I was with in the theater, though small, was most likely not comprised of others like me because they never laughed or showed any kind of understanding once through the whole thing. In the climactic and freaking awesome scene where the monsters are released from their boxes and all holy hell breaks loose, I was laughing my ass off, silently clapping, and wanting to stand up and cheer my absolute approval. Everybody else? Hardly any reaction at all. It made me a little sad.

But forget about them. This movie made me so stoked and excited about horror again. I don't think it necessarily "reinvented" the genre as other reviewers are suggesting, but I think it might be a "refresher" of sorts. It's one of the most original ideas to come to horror in a long time, and it serves as a reminder that horror doesn't have to ever die. With this genre, we can go as far out there as we want to with stories and concepts for future horror movies. We can use the tried and true methods for making a successful and gory film (i.e. five kids going to a cabin in the woods) but we can twist it into something completely different. Or we can learn from this movie and stay away from those stereotypes and continue to think of fresh, exciting ideas. It is possible, and Whedon and Goddard proved that with this stellar and mind-blowingly impressive film. I think it's going to be one to talk about and look back on for years to come.

14 comments:

  1. Posted my review of it yesterday. If I have to be completely honest, I liked it a lot, but I expected MORE. A lot more. Yes, the concept was genius, and the script was super-clever, but I thought the execution was lacking a bit. I wish they'd put more effort into it. The practical effects on the sadistic zombies were incredible, but the CGI work was SO cheesy, I couldn't believe it. All the monsters looked like they popped out of a video game. It was ridiculous. Ridiculous!

    Incredibly thoughtful and well-written review, Michele. Mine isn't as much, but you can check it out anyway. LOL. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Nebs! And I do agree with you there. I sort of let the CGI thing go for now because I was way too stoked about the story, but I did notice that it was a little muchly, if you know what I mean. It wasn't bad enough to completely lose me because for that situation (the elevators opening and shit going crazy in like 3 seconds) CGI was probably the only way they could accomplish that. So I think it's forgivable.

      Delete
  2. Michele, I agree, and I have nothing against the use of CGI. I just thought the CGIs themselves were bad. The should have worked with a better special effects team to achieve bigger effect.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh okay, I got you now. I'd have to watch it again to really judge the effects - too distracted by the awesomeness of the scene... :) CGI is usually so obvious anyway, it never looks truly seamless to me.

      Delete
  3. I'm going to go out on a limb and speculate that this movie had an astonishingly low budget; I'm sure they got the best effects they could afford. And really, the shabby CGI only serves to emphasize the fact that these are not "real" monsters, but constructs designed by a company to exploit people's fears.

    In other words, the CGI is subtly reinforcing the themes of the movie; it's working for, not against, what Goddard and Whedon are doing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You know, this is a super-spoiler-y review. I live in a college town and going opening weekend guarantees being surrounded by talking and, even worse, texting (all those bright little screens). I'm planning to see it tomorrow and now I know about the drug angle (I quit reading at that point). I really enjoy your blog, but please, a little warning next time! That said, even though I've avoided spoilers as much as possible, I know there's a lot more to the movie and I'm really stoked!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, the first sentence of the second paragraph kinda says that I'm going to spoil everything, but I'm sorry if it wasn't as clear as it should have been.

      Trust me, there's a lot more to enjoy about the movie than what you already know. If you're a horror fan at all, you'll love it!

      Delete
    2. Okay, I'm back and I've seen it and I'm still grinning. What a ride! I just loved it! I'm not sure the rest of the audience enjoyed it as much as my friends and I did; maybe that reflects the fact that The Evil Dead is a decade older than most of them (God, I feel old...). We were laughing in places no one else was. I confess that I left my non-horror-fan partner at home and I'm glad I did. It's better that he didn't catch me snickering at the guts dripping from the ceiling (in general I don't like gory movies, but really, that was SO far over-the-top).

      I too thought the CGI was iffy in some of the final scenes, but as Bryant commented above, these were not 'naturally occurring' monsters, so it didn't bother me as much as it might have. (Where did they come from, exactly? Were they built, bred? Enquiring minds want to know.) This was indeed a low budget film and I forgive the CGI because many of those scenes would not have been possible with just practical effects.

      I will be super-disappointed if the DVD doesn't have a featurette on the contents of the basement. At least there are stills of that whiteboard floating around the web, but I want a good look at all those MacGuffins.

      The two unexpected stars? How great to see Tom Lenk again (looking good, Andrew!)! And Ladies and Gentlemen, let's hear it for the bong!

      Delete
  5. The movie wasn't made for me. I totally hated the smartassery, the smugness, the Joss-Whedon-ness of the movie.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "The Cabin in the Woods" is one of my favorite movies I have seen. I worship this movie a bit too much. And I saw it because you recommended it. Here's what I have learned about it since I saw it first.

    Cabin had most of the best of the best effects artists out there. A lot of the monsters were actually "practical" effects like the Ballerina, Werewolf, Fornicus, the Buckners, the Merman, etc. A lot of the blood was real too. I didn't think the CGI was horribly distracting except for a few scenes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad I recommended something so awesome for you, Anon! This was definitely not one to miss.

      Delete
  7. Sometimes I think I'm the only person who really disliked this movie.

    I wanted to love it, and did...until they explained it

    Kat Webmistress of Shivers of Horror

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great review! I like your interpretation of it, that hadn't occurred to me :)

    ReplyDelete
  9. This movie has found a spot among the greatest movies I have ever seen. It rivals Oldboy and The Evil Dead (original) for my favorite horror/thriller movie of all time.

    There just isn't enough time or space for me to adequately describe how I feel about the genius of Joss Whedon...everything the man touches turns to gold. The motorcycle scene with "Thor" exercising his stereotypical manliness in attempting to save the day by jumping the chasm was so well executed that I found myself leaning forward in my seat, hoping he'd make it, only to (a little too) loudly "hoot" and laugh, nearly to the point of tears, in the middle of a crowded theater when he smashed against the shield-wall.

    Cabin in the Woods serves to demonstrate just how fully Joss Whedon understands and can manipulate the course of popular culture in TV and movies today. His smartass, sarcastic, cleverly witty ways of approaching the subject matter is deft beyond compare, and will have me devouring anything and everything he brings to the table for as long as he cares to bring it.

    Great review, great blog...I'm glad I happened upon it tonight, though I'm not even sure how I got here..

    ReplyDelete