In a facility at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean, a group of underwater miners are on their last days of a mission to retrieve silver and other precious metals from the depths. They discover a sunken Russian ship, the "Leviathan," and unknowingly bring on board the reason the ship was sunk in the first place - the crew was experimenting with genetic mutation drugs that turn people into hideous sea creatures.
Yeah, so I'm going to say what probably everybody else says about this movie: I liked Leviathan... when it was called The Thing. Or Alien. It rips from both and doesn't seem like it's trying to hide it at all. With all the metal hallways and bulkhead doors and crawlspaces with pipes and shit, the feeling of claustrophobia and being trapped is straight up Alien. Just underwater this time. The way the creature is able to sneakily hide in air ducts (even when it keeps growing and growing) and pop out at the just the right time also made me think of Alien, so there are no feelings of suspense or surprise at any time while watching Leviathan. The Thing was suspenseful. Alien was scary. Leviathan was boring and predictable.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10848/10848c3683a5d03da77cbef624289f51583a5ba5" alt=""
The kicker is that even after watching the whole damn movie, I still don't think I've fully seen the creature. We are shown different bits and pieces of the creature as it attacks at different times but I'm not for sure how all pieces come together or what the whole thing looks like. It's got a fishy head, human-like arms, tentacles, but no legs, so how the hell does it move? The practical creature effects by Stan Winston are nice, and therefore I would have appreciated being able to see the whole thing in a wide shot or something. Actually as I was surfing around pictures to include here, I came across one that is supposedly a prop replica of the creature:
Huh. I would have never guessed. There's actually two creatures at one point in the movie I think but there's no differentiation between them so I don't know if they both looked like this or what. At the end, the creature pops up on the surface with the survivors after the facility implodes itself (because that's always fun to think about happening), and even then they only show it in quick cuts.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54300/54300abdc05f2338fcf9ff717408cc275ecb2358" alt=""
Eh, you're not missing anything with Leviathan. The creature effects are great and I liked the practical nastiness of them, but everything else just didn't do it for me.
Nice!!!
ReplyDeleteThe phone's ringing. Answer the call in Rubel Rafael Ahmed's spooky "M is for Mental Image"! http://26th.abcsofdeathpart2.com/entry/m-is-for-mental-image/
Please give it a watch and don't forget to hit the LIKE button above the video on the site!
Hi Michele,
ReplyDeleteI am an owner from this Leviathan Movie Prop and many other figures
and I am a "total grazy" collector from Germany!
I contact a few month ago the Artist, Timothy Martin from ADI
and he make me this wonderfull piece of Art and the Blairmonster
from Carpenters "the Thing". Please look at "Outpost 31":
http://www.outpost31.com/FanThings/CoolStuff/CoolStuff.shtml
All the best!
Holger
Thanks for the review! It's pretty one point. This was on TV the other day and I remember seeing the VHS tape in the store in the store and always wanted to see it, but was never able to. I was casually watching it while working on other things and was glad to know that I didn't really need to pay attention to it! lol!
ReplyDelete--Noir
Predictable, yeah, but it's actually a pretty solid deathtrap film. What sold me on it was the setting. They went to town with deep sea hardware, some of which was real (the suits are variations on deep-diving hard suits from Sweden). The creature design was interesting, and it's very hard to go wrong with vintage Stan Winston.
ReplyDeleteI'd almost welcome someone remaking this one. I say 'almost' because it'd probably end up in the hands of SyFy or The Asylum, and we'd get dodgy CG and absolutely terrible acting.
Looking back, I think I was way too harsh on this film!! It IS really good, with a tight plot and solid cast and directing... I think I just focused too much on comparing it to other films that I was seeing in it rather than what the actual film was giving me.
DeleteI don't know that it really needs a remake though - it is dated, but Stan Winston is amazing the effects still hold up really well.